fbpx
Related Posts
2 Comments
Jordan Ellis

Interesting take on Google’s shifting stance toward AI content. The note about Google rewarding “useful, people-first content regardless of how it’s produced” really stood out. With AI tools now generating over 44% of marketing content (HubSpot, 2024), I’m curious, how do you guys differentiate between AI-assisted writing and AI-generated-at-scale when it comes to quality control? Would love to hear more about your internal process or standards.

We agree, Google’s emphasis on “useful, people-first content” is a game-changer. To balance AI efficiency with quality, we treat AI as a tool that supports our human creativity rather than replacing it. Our process involves using AI for initial drafts or research, followed by thorough human editing to ensure relevance, accuracy, and tone. We also have strict standards for originality and fact-checking to avoid generic or low-value content. This blend helps us maintain high-quality output while benefiting from AI’s speed and data insights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked *